in the news

 

slide shows

 

why this project sucks

 

Smith Parker watch

 

los politicos

 

Does your neighborhood love the Excess Project?

 

STOP this project

 

contact us

 

 

 

conflict of interest

 

is this project's middle name. Smith Parker, officially listed as "Project Manager" for the 35W Access Project is only the centerpiece of a vast tangle of unethical, undemocratic, and one would hope, still illegal practices that have moved this project forward from its inception.

 

what is Smith Parker? - or - conflict of interest #1

Smith Parker is law firm whose claim to fame is their expertise at lobbying and public relations. They are not engineers, or architects, or urban planners, or economic development consultants, or even landscape architects - they're LAWYERS AND LOBBYISTS. But they have been designated as project managers for just about every major transportation and land use project in the area, from the 35W Access Project to the upcoming Lake Street Repaving - even though they also happen to be legal counsel to the biggest corporations, land-owners, and eventual beneficiaries, of these projects and their outcomes.

 

conflict of interest #2

Tom Johnson, a Smith Parker employee, has since 1998 been the project manager for this whole endeavor, supposedly acting on behalf of the citizens and taxpayers of our city, our county and our state. His prior job, as a consultant with Abbott Northwestern Hospital and Allina Hospitals and Clinics was to make sure that the hospitals' new ramps at 26th and 28th streets, got built: "that is all we wanted to do. That was our project." (an actual quote - read the story here) - He is still doing that for them, but guess who's picking up the tab?

 

Want proof? How come the 28th Street flyover is still part of the project? has any neighborhood requested the construction of a NEW highway off-ramp to 28th Street?

 

conflict of interest #3

Besides being legal counsel to all the major corporate players in the area (including Allina Health System, Children's Hospitals and Clinics, and Wells Fargo), Smith Parker is also counsel to their non-profit behemoths who like to claim altruistic motivations for their self-benefitting initiatives (Phillips Partnership, Midtown Community Works, etc.).

 

Because this city is run by sold-out Democrats, this association with "do-gooder" corporate institutions provides convenient cover for the politicians while still allowing them access to the corporate dough and assorted favor$$$ they crave.

 

You don't believe that our political representatives would be so stupid, or so compromised, or both, that they would give power over major transportation and land use decisions to a law firm that also happens to represent the biggest big boys affected by those same decisions? - don't take our word for it, just go visit their website and see their list of clients.

 

conflict of interest #4

Who made the decision to continue with OSM Consultants when the privately funded Abbott Northwestern Transportation Study (of 1997) somehow morphed into the Phillips Partnership's Access Project? After Smith Parker and other project lobbyists secured federal funding - was there any public bidding process for design services or was the project simply given to OSM? what about when OSM went out of business and some of their staff went to work for SEH - was the project then simply handed over to SEH? - was there even polite pretense of any public bidding process then?

 

conflict of interest #5

Smith Parker knows that their clients want the ramp to 28th Street built. So when the DOT told them that they would get no ramp unless they also accommodated new lanes on 35W (a $40 million addition to the project cost), Smith Parker did not hesitate to force a hurried vote to include this absolutely huge increase in project scope and cost - Mn/DOT basically played its cards right, knowing that Smith Parker could be counted on putting its clients' interest ahead of the expressed wishes of the same Minneapolis neighborhoods that less than ten years earlier had mobilized against this same proposal. Even then-Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton, herself a Partnershipmate, was opposed to this - nonetheless, Smith Parker put the interests of Abbott and Wells Fargo ahead of that of the citizens who are footing the bill.

 

How can they get away with it?

Very easily - they know all the right politicians and are not shy about using their influence. Among their bedmates, you can find:

  • Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, who promised to do "upfront bonding" of up to $25 million from the County to ensure the project gets built even if the Legislature does not set aside the $98 million that is Mn/DOT's share but that (surprise !) the DOT does not have. According to the geniuses at the County, the Legislature will then have no choice but to reimburse them.
  • former Metropolitan Council chair Ted Mondale, who recently designated Smith Parker as the Metropolitan Council's "Smart Growth" counsel, overseeing transportation and land development intitiatives throughout the state - not a bad start for what could be the "begining of a beautiful friendship" for the future Democrat king and his corporate connection facilitators !
  • US Representative Martin Sabo, who as chair of the House Appropriations Committee has been busy laying golden eggs for his Smith Parker buddies. He continues to authorize the federal moneys that pay the bills for Smith Parker and their handpicked consultants.

 

So is Smith Parker the devil?

Although there's room for disagreement on this, we're not saying that the people of Smith Parker are all bad - we're sure that some of them are even liked by their pets. But it's just that their goal is not the creation of honest public processes or fostering genuine public participation - that is simply not their job. They are a law firm whose aim is to move forward initiatives that benefit their clients. Period.

 

And if our idiot politicians have put them in a position where they are now able to form and direct public policy, well, shame on us for electing the fools, and shame on them for thinking we won't care.

 

So should I just give up and move to Portland?

No, of course not. You can do plenty to help stop this project and the type of undemocratic privatization of government functions that it represents.

 

You can help us by:

 

... and by telling your friends to do the same, because together we can stop this - Remember, NO BUILD IS AN OPTION !

 

 

 

design options

 

three-lane alternatives

 

traffic terminology

 

how they do it in Chicago

 

links and resources

 

from PPS

 

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)