Share your opinion and be rewarded! what they do with your taxes


 

in the news

 

slide shows

 

why this project sucks

 

Smith Parker watch

 

los politicos

 

Does your neighborhood love the Excess Project?

 

STOP this project

 

contact us

 

 

 

Smith Parker showcase: Taxpayer-funded bullying !

 

Smith Parker, the law firm appointed by the County to manage the Excess Project, has worked to marginalize dissenters and squelch criticism in order to create the illusion of neighborhood support for this corporate welfare scheme.

 

Official project letters criticizing dissenters are shared with corporate representatives, lobbyists, and select public officials, but not with any neighborhood representatives and certainly never with the persons alluded to in those letters.

 

Information is kept on citizens who publicly question the wisdom of the project, and who then become the topic of project meetings and documents:

 

Document 1

Letter from Tom Johnson (on Phillips Partnership letterhead) to Louis Smith (Smith Parker), Peter McLaughlin (Hennepin County), Gail Dorfman (Hennepin County), Dan Kratz (Children's Hospital), Eric Eoloff (Abbott Hospital), Muffie Gabler (Wells Fargo), Ellen McInnis (Wells Fargo lobbyist, registration #8608), and Sue Holden (Wells Fargo).

 

on Dave Harstad:

"Now I know why Dave Harstad has been saying the things he has about the Phillips Partnership abd the I-35W Access Project ..."

 

"On another topic regarding Dave Harstad ..."

 

download a complete digital copy of the letter (pdf, 1.1 Mb)

 

Document 2

letter from Tom Johnson (on Smith Parker letterhead) to Jim Grube (Hennepin County Transportation Engineer), copy to Louis Smith (Smith Parker)

 

on Robert Lilligren:

"[He] was voicing his objection to the fly-over ramp to 28th street saying it was unnecessary and required too much right-of-way. He had obviously been talking with others from the city previous to this meeting ..."

 

on Antonio Rosell:

"[He] continued to bash the Access Project saying that its initial objectives were flawed. He keeps saying that big business and big government are collaborating to the detriment of neighborhood residents ... Peter McLaughlin, Craig Anderson and I kept responding to his rhetoric with facts leaving others the impression that he is more of a "bomb thrower" than a serious critic of the project."

 

download a complete digital copy of the letter (pdf, 2.1 Mb)

 

"please refrain from posting your speculations that are completely groundless and insulting"

Another tactic employed by Smith Parker to minimize criticism of the project is to send repeated emails to people that question the assertions made by project proponents. You can view a sample below:

 

send us your correspondence

If you have received any correspondence from Smith Parker representatives which you felt was bullying or otherwise designed to keep you from speaking your mind, please feel free to forward it to smithparkerbullying@stride-mn.org - we'll add it to the list we're compiling and will add it to our site when we do our next update. Please let us know if you'd like us to not use your name, and if you'd like us to record (but not post) your message.

 

 

 

design options

 

three-lane alternatives

 

traffic terminology

 

how they do it in Chicago

 

links and resources

 

from PPS

 

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)