Share your opinion and be rewarded! 35W Access Project hits bumps in the road


 

in the news

 

slide shows

 

why this project sucks

 

Smith Parker watch

 

los politicos

 

Does your neighborhood love the Excess Project?

 

STOP this project

 

contact us

 

 

 

35W Access Project hits bumps in the road

 

published 11.20.02

online at http://www.pulsetc.com/article.php?sid=227


by Ed Felien

Pulse of the Twin Cities

 

The Project Area Committee (PAC) for the 35W Access Project held its third and final public hearing on last Saturday, at the 3rd Precinct Station at 31st and Nicollet. It was in two parts. The first part, which was supposed to run an hour, from 10 to 11, was a description of the proposal by staff for the project. The second part, comments from the community, was supposed to run from 11 to 12. The first part ran a little long and the second part ran even longer. An overflow crowd of more than 80 finished the meeting almost an hour past schedule.

 

This was the first series of public hearings where testimony from the public was invited. The PAC has been meeting for four years, mostly in the mornings on weekdays, a time which is inconvenient for most working adults in South Minneapolis.

 

The PAC began as a consultancy between Allina Hospitals and Tom Johnson of the Smith-Parker Law Firm. Allina wanted to make it easier for patients and staff to find the Abbott Northwestern hospital. Their first idea was to place were entrance and exit ramps at 26th and 28th Streets where one-ways connect to the hospital campus. This was found to be impossible because of the bend in the freeway at those points, so their next proposal was a flyover ramp from Lake Street connecting to 28th Street.

 

Their next step was an easy one. They sold the idea to The Phillips Partnership. Allina was a member, and Smith-Parker was legal counsel and project director. Honeywell and Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton and Council Member Brian Herron and County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin were members. The Phillips Partnership was responsible for probably the most successful urban renewal project in recent history in Minneapolis. It supervised the demolition of a square block of substandard homes and constructed new homes and duplexes. It was urban removal of poor people, like most other projects of its kind, but the major objective of Honeywell’s Bonsigniore at that time was the elimination of crime in the area around Honeywell Headquarters. It worked.

 

The first hint of trouble for the project came when they expanded the PAC to include neighborhood people. They handpicked a Chairperson and several other friendly business and community types, and neighborhood groups filled out the list. There were about 36 members of the PAC. The staff has always been Smith-Parker, and Hennepin County has been paying the bills.

 

One of the first speakers at the meeting Saturday was Peter McLaughlin, County Commissioner for the District east of 35W that includes the Honeywell complex (now owned and operated by Wells Fargo) and Allina Hospitals which operates Abbott Northwestern Hospital. He pointed to the thousands of jobs that Wells Fargo and Allina have created. He objected to the anti-business tone of much of the criticism of the project. He said businesses on Lake Street have asked repeatedly for access on Lake Street.

 

[In the interests of truth in reporting, it must be admitted that Peter McLaughlin trashed me in the recent General Election 78% to 22%. I campaigned against most of the “improvements” to 35W that are being proposed by the PAC. He did not directly answer my criticisms of the proposal during the campaign, nor did he actively defend the PAC, so, although his re-election cannot be seen as a mandate for the proposal, it has to be seen as more generalized support by the electorate for his leadership.]

 

Councilmember Dean Zimmermann had to leave the meeting early, but his aide read a statement by him. He doesn’t think this is a good project. He supports his colleague, Robert Lilligren, the 8th Ward Councilmember who lives directly under the path of the fly-over lane, and who has consistently opposed the project. He believes the $153 million could be better invested in building a transit system for this city and region. If the project does move forward, it is essential that it include a separated bus lane on the edge, or even better, a rail line down the middle of the freeway. Of the options on the table, 6B is the most disruptive. It seems likely that the reason 6B is on the table at all is to get the community to compromise on the still undesirable 6A. We have major gridlock downtown, and what sense does it make to continue to build freeways to dump more cars into downtown? Why not focus on building a sustainable system rather than continuing to put lipstick on this pig?

 

The parade of speakers included once and future candidates for City Council. Barb Lickness opposed the project. She noted her Whittier Neighborhood voted almost unanimously to oppose the project. Vicki Brock said she was pleased to see her community had a lot to do with this project, and she was pleased to see it is being carried on. Valerie Metoyer, wife and partner of former 8th Ward candidate Zach Metoyer, supported the project because she believed it would benefit new Latino and Somali businesses on Lake Street, and because there is nothing wrong in it benefitting Wells Fargo and Allina.

 

Although the audience seemed strongly opposed to the project, speeches were evenly divided between those in favor and those against.

 

The always colorful and controversial Basim Sabri said, “This is a good project, a good purpose. We should all support it.” He also said, because his property might be affected by the project, Councilmember Lilligren should declare he has a conflict of interest and not vote on the project.

 

Antonio Rosell, three-year PAC member representing Ventura Village, said if people should be disqualified from participation in this process because of their conflicts of interest, then Tom Johnson and Smith-Parker should be disqualified from participation because they are legal counsel to Wells Fargo and Allina; they are legal counsel to the Phillips Partnership; they are hired by the County; and, now, they have been hired by the Met Council to help shepherd growth through the entire metropolitan area.

 

Tom McGreevy, former PAC member, chair of the Nicollet Lake Business Association, and owner/operator of the Pearle Vision store on Lake Street next to 35W, had two letters read to the group in which he said he heard McLaughlin say at a meeting he attended that he had told Wells Fargo that he would try to get them access (the flyover ramp) if they acquired the Honeywell campus. In a second letter McGreevy said Tom Johnson and Peter McLaughlin had attended a meeting of the Nicollet Lake Business Association with the attempt to stifle criticism of the project and intimidate the members of the Association.

 

The last speaker was Gail Dorfman, the County Commissioner representing the district on the west side of 35W. She tried to strike a balanced and conciliatory tone, “This plan does not have to be the final plan. We can make adjustments. It doesn’t have to be voted up or down.”

 

Controversy and contention over the proposal was not resolved with Saturday’s meeting. It may have just begun.


The 35W Access Project at a glance [with very opinionated commentary]:

  • Move the 35th Street and 36th Street entrance and exit ramps south to 38th Street to avoid the traffic weaving caused by the close proximity to the 31st Street entrance ramp. [To solve this problem it would not be necessary to move the 35th Street entrance ramp, only the 36th Street exit ramp. This would eliminate the traffic weaving; it would lessen traffic on 38th Street and moderate the problems caused by excessive traffic on 35th and 36th Streets.]
  • New northbound entrance ramp at Lake Street. [This is a bad idea. Traffic would use this entrance for a quick trip downtown or for a route to 94 West, and this would mean they would be moving over two to four lanes of fast moving traffic in a short distance. It is unsafe and unnecessary. Also, an entrance ramp to 35W from Lake Street is not access it is egress.]
  • New southbound exit ramp at Lake Street. [This seems sensible and safe, but can it be done without serious disruption to the Whittier community?]
  • Widening of Lake Street from six to eight lanes. [This is unnecessary. Traffic on Lake Street has actually declined in the last ten years, and a new exit ramp would not increase traffic significantly.]
  • Flyover ramp from Lake Street to 28th Street for workers and patients at Wells Fargo and Allina. [This is unnecessary and would create a serious blight on the neighborhood.]

 

 

 

 

 

design options

 

three-lane alternatives

 

traffic terminology

 

how they do it in Chicago

 

links and resources

 

from PPS

 

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)