Share your opinion and be rewarded! Part I: Linking Lake to I-35 - whose gain, whose pain?


 

in the news

 

slide shows

 

why this project sucks

 

Smith Parker watch

 

los politicos

 

Does your neighborhood love the Excess Project?

 

STOP this project

 

contact us

 

 

 

Part I: Linking Lake to I-35 - whose gain, whose pain?

 

By: Isaac Peterson, III
Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder
online at http://www.spokesman-recorder.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=18217&sID=4

 

Originally posted 11/7/2002

 

Corporate interests, neighborhood residents face off over proposal to expand Lake Street access to I-35W

 

First of a two-part story

 

According to an October 11 Star Tribune article, the 2000 Census showed that Minneapolis and St. Paul were two of the only Midwestern cities to gain population from 1990 to 2000. The census also seems to indicate that the growth occurred more in the downtown and inner city areas than in the suburbs.

 

Immigrants, particularly from Asian and African countries, made up a large part of the population increase. Population projections into the future show Minneapolis gaining more than a million new residents in the coming decades.

 

Most agree that now is the time for Minneapolis to plan for the population increase, and in particular to lay the groundwork for efficient transportation.

 

One of the major questions is whether Minneapolis, in light of the population projections, should be mass transit-based, or automobile oriented, as Los Angeles is.

 

A group called the Phillips Partnership has drafted proposals that seem to favor an automobile-based Minneapolis, and will have considerable impact in South Minneapolis, particularly in the Phillips neighborhood. The Phillips Partnership website lists its members as "...top executives of prominent corporations and non-profit organizations, Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, Metropolitan Council Chair Ted Mondale, and Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin. Commissioner McLaughlin and Jim Campbell, retired CEO of Wells Fargo, serve as the Partnership's Co-chairs."

 

The firm Smith-Parker is handling public relations for the Partnership.

 

The Partnership proposes to construct a southbound exit ramp and a northbound entrance ramp off of I-35W at Lake Street, and an off-ramp from northbound I-35W to 28th St. The proposal also calls for additional lanes on Lake Street, an 18-foot-wide median on Lake, and converting some currently one-way streets, like Blaisdell, to two-lane traffic.

 

To a South Minneapolis neighborhood organization called the Southside Transit Initiative for Determining our Environment (STRIDE), the proposal raises more questions and concerns than it offers solutions.

 

STRIDE stresses that the "I-35 Access Project" is skewed overwhelmingly in favor of the corporate interests involved, as illustrated by the Phillips Partnership's membership. They maintain that the project is not being done for the good of neighborhood residents, but rather to make it easier for suburban commuters to come into the Phillips neighborhood to take jobs from the community.

 

STRIDE member Jeff Carlson believes that most of the initial impetus for the access project came from concerns aired by Abbott-Northwestern Hospital. "They said their patients and employees weren't comfortable driving in that neighborhood, so they wanted ramps that would come right to their parking lot... That was back when Minneapolis was called 'Murderopolis,' but a lot of the neighborhood has turned around."

 

The practical effect for the new residents reflected in the Census can be seen by anyone who looks on Nicollet Avenue between 24th Street and Lake. Where previously that stretch and others nearby were run down and crime-ridden, today they are populated by thriving businesses owned and run largely by Hispanic, Asian, African and Middle Eastern immigrants. STRIDE credits the recent immigrants for turning that area around and creating a healthy local economy.

 

Minneapolis City Council Member Robert Lilligren echoes this when he says, "...an economy and a culture, and a kind of a mosaic is developing, a kind of a mixed culture, and it's developing its own economic roots and engines." Lilligren goes on to express concern about how building ramps and widening Lake Street might be a negative factor working against that mixed culture.

 

Lilligren says he has his doubts that Minneapolis needs to develop a "regional economy" that would serve primarily to make the areas accessible to suburbanites at the expense of the people who actually live there.

 

However, Tom Johnson of Smith-Parker says, "This project does not contain elements that are negative to those neighborhoods." Johnson also maintains that the plans so far have met with the approval of most area residents and businesses. STRIDE contradicts this and lists on its website a number of area neighborhood groups that have expressed their disapproval of the plans for the Phillips neighborhood.

 

One of STRIDE's main objections is to the plans proposed for Lake Street.

 

Says STRIDE member David Piehl, "We believe the widening of Lake Street will cause Lake Street to lose pedestrian appeal, which in turn negatively affects the pedestrian orientation which serves the local community." Piehl also believes that entrance and exit ramps in the community will serve to create physical barriers for the area residents, making it necessary to use cars to get around in their own neighborhood.

 

Johnson, however, says, "We are criticized because of what we propose as changes on Lake Street...because of on and off ramps. We are proposing no additional driving lanes, only turning lanes and wider sidewalks with an 18-foot median." Johnson says that the median will provide a safe place for pedestrians who cannot cross Lake Street in one traffic light cycle. The medians would also have trees and plants to make them look more appealing.

 

STRIDE's Carlson calls the effort to "revitalize Lake" a phony issue, as Lake Street is already vital.

 

Critics charge that the proposal for the Phillips neighborhood would be like a South Minneapolis Hollman Project: present low-income residents would be forced out with no provision made for their needs. At the same time, the neighborhood would be remade into something that would be attractive for suburbanites.

 

Critics also maintain that the "improvements" would induce suburban commuters to come into the city for jobs that would not be made available to the area residents. These commuters would then take their incomes back with them to the suburbs, harming the economic base of a neighborhood that is starting to find its own way financially.

 

Smith-Parker's Johnson dismisses such claims: "It's clear that opponents are picking out bits and pieces of the plan, and then telling stories about those pieces that are far-fetched... Residents and businesses have received calls from opponents that are making them uncomfortable. And they're getting personal with the attacks on me."

 

STRIDE's Piehl and Scott Smedberg respond by asking other questions. They wonder, "Why is a public works project being pushed by a public relations law firm? Why did they hire a lobbyist instead of a community organizer or community group?"

 

Next week: the answer to "Why is a public works project being pushed by a public relations law firm?" and other questions. Also: the players and the stakes.

 

Tom Johnson may be reached at 612-344-1500.
STRIDE's website address is http://www.stride-mn.org
Isaac Peterson III welcomes reader comments at ipeterson@spokesman-recorder.com


 

design options

 

three-lane alternatives

 

traffic terminology

 

how they do it in Chicago

 

links and resources

 

from PPS

 

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)