in the news

 

slide shows

 

why this project sucks

 

Smith Parker watch

 

los politicos

 

Does your neighborhood love the Excess Project?

 

STOP this project

 

contact us

 

 

 

Putting things in context

- or -

how privatized planning undermines fairness in our cities

 

Just about everything that isn't bolted down in America is getting privatized these days. All is fair game, from prisons and other seemingly profit-proof institutions, to big public infrastructure like water and power supplies, to basic government services like welfare and even (well, maybe not anymore) social security. The driving assumption behind these moves is the belief that the private sector can get things done faster, cheaper, and just plain better than the public agencies it seeks to replace. Experience, including the recent adventures of Enron and the California Utilities Board, points out that this is not always so. But judging privatization by cost efficiency alone overlooks a more important measure: that of fairness.

 

Consider emerging practices in city planning. New public/private planning initiatives threaten to undermine the already precarious balance existing between economic efficiency and fairness in our cities. In Minneapolis, a business group calling itself the Phillips Partnership is leading efforts to modify transportation infrastructure in the central city. Partnership members, a virtual Who's Who of corporate big boys, have used their political and economic connections to gain control of project direction and management. Not surprisingly, project recommendations benefit their business and real estate interests while negatively impacting area neighborhoods and small businesses. The story of how this private group managed to gain control of transportation planning is a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of privatized planning.

 

The I-35W Access Project began in 1996. That year, Honeywell and Allina Healthcare hired OSM Consultants to prepare preliminary designs for improved access to their sites. Both companies were concerned about losing customers and employees to widespread fears about crime and safety. After all, they argued, they were in the middle of Phillips and people were afraid of driving through the neighborhood to get to their sites. Phillips was (and still is) the poorest neighborhood in Minneapolis, with poverty rates that reach 50% within one of the most prosperous metro regions in the country. The solution OSM came up with was brilliant: instead of helping drivers navigate their way through the neighborhood with clearer signage, new ramps from 35W would be constructed that would deposit drivers at the institutions' parking lots at 26th and 28th Street. Of course, such a solution was expensive, and would require funding from and cooperation with federal, state and local agencies. To broaden their base of support, Honeywell and Allina invited other area corporations and landholders to join their initiative, and expanded the focus of their strategy to make it more palatable to politicians and public agencies.

 

The Phillips Partnership formally organized in early 1997, and included Honeywell, Allina, USBank, Great Lake Center (the old Sears site), and the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County. The stated goal of the Partnership became the improvement of the physical and social landscape of Phillips. The Partnership's transportation plan expanded to include the construction of two new ramps at Lake Street, which was provided with incomplete access to 35W when the freeway was built in the 1960s. This was a smart decision, as it guaranteed support from politicians and small businesses who saw the new ramps as critical for the revitalization of the Lake Street commercial strip.

 

The Partnership then began work to obtain funding for and control of the project. Eager to "reinvent" their roles, Mn/DOT and Hennepin County agreed to cede the project to the Partnership if it could obtain funds for design. The Partnership lobbied for funds and succeeded. In early 1998 Congress approved a $2 million grant for planning and design of transportation improvements for the area centered on 35W and Lake Street. As lead agency, the Partnership was placed in direct charge of project management and guidance. Hennepin County, Mn/DOT and the city had approval power over Partnership recommendations but would not otherwise be involved in the management of the project. The Partnership hired Smith Parker LLP, a well-connected local law firm, for project management, and hired OSM Consultants (designers of the original plans) for the engineering.

 

Design work began in late 1998. Throughout the process, the design team's insensitivity to the project area was frequently apparent: one of the proposals involved tearing down four blocks of housing in order to accommodate a highway ramp and a proposed Home Depot. Another would have permanently closed the access ramp to 35W and 94 at 5th Avenue and Franklin, leaving Phillips, Whittier, and Steven square residents without access to the freeway system.


When the matter of the ramps to 28th Street was approached, neighborhood concerns were similarly excluded from consideration. Long-standing complaints about high traffic levels and poor pedestrian safety were ignored. When residents and neighborhood representatives made clear their opposition to the ramps on 28th, Partnership consultants produced traffic projections showing dire consequences for the city if the ramps were not built. Additionally, veiled threats about the possible relocation of Abbot Hospital and the decreased attractiveness of the Honeywell site were made by Partnership representatives.

 

When results of the design process were presented to the public at open house meetings in September of 1999 many expressed dissatisfaction with ramp configurations. Comments gathered at the meetings were presented in a Partnership brochure in a way that pretended to show public support for ramp construction (critical for securing construction funding). Only after neighborhood representatives complained to public officials did the Partnership redesign the project brochure. It was then not released.

 

In the end, the project is moving forward mostly unaffected by citizen participation. Although construction of the ramp at 26th Street and the closure of the 5th Avenue ramp were averted it was mostly due to technical considerations that would have required significant expense to overcome. At this point, it looks like 28th Street will be directly connected to 35W. Its construction will require the demolition of 10 houses. Total costs for the 35W Access Project are expected to exceed $150 million.

 

City change has never been a pretty process; all parties involved compete against each other to gain the most advantage for their interests and positions - very little of the process is about fairness. Government agencies are the only mediating forces that have, at least on paper, the obligation to treat citizens fairly. Removing these safeguards in the name of efficiency does nothing to make our cities better places to live.

 

 

... and a little Marx:

"The separation of public works from the state, and their migration into the domain of the works undertaken by capital itself, indicates the degree to which the real community has constituted itself in the form of capital."

[Marx, 1857]

 

 

 

design options

 

three-lane alternatives

 

traffic terminology

 

how they do it in Chicago

 

links and resources

 

from PPS

 

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)